What are some conceptualizations that work in mathematics but are not strictly true?

I’m having an argument with someone who thinks it’s never justified to teach something that’s not strictly correct. I disagree: often, the pedagogically most efficient way to make progress is to iteratively learn and unlearn along the way.

I’m looking for examples in mathematics (and possibly physics) where students are commonly taught something that’s not strictly true, but works, at least in some restricted manner, and is a good way to understand a concept until one gets to a more advanced stage.

Answer

How about this notorious one I remember from high school?

f(x) is just a fancy name for y.”

Attribution
Source : Link , Question Author : MGA , Answer Author : Community

Leave a Comment