I have an HP 50g graphing calculator and I am using it to calculate the standard deviation of some data. In the statistics calculation there is a type which can have two values:

Sample

PopulationI didn’t change it, but I kept getting the wrong results for the standard deviation. When I changed it to “Population” type, I started getting correct results!

Why is that? As far as I know, there is only one type of standard deviation which is to calculate the root-mean-square of the values!

Did I miss something?

**Answer**

There are, in fact, two different formulas for standard deviation here: The population standard deviation σ and the sample standard deviation s.

If x1,x2,…,xN denote all N values from a population, then the (population) standard deviation is

σ=√1NN∑i=1(xi−μ)2,

where μ is the mean of the population.

If x1,x2,…,xN denote N values from a sample, however, then the (sample) standard deviation is

s=√1N−1N∑i=1(xi−ˉx)2,

where ˉx is the mean of the sample.

The reason for the change in formula with the sample is this: When you’re calculating s you are normally using s2 (the sample variance) to estimate σ2 (the population variance). The problem, though, is that if you don’t know σ you generally don’t know the population mean μ, either, and so you have to use ˉx in the place in the formula where you normally would use μ. Doing so introduces a slight bias into the calculation: Since ˉx is calculated from the sample, the values of xi are on average closer to ˉx than they would be to μ, and so the sum of squares ∑Ni=1(xi−ˉx)2 turns out to be smaller on average than ∑Ni=1(xi−μ)2. It just so happens that that bias can be corrected by dividing by N−1 instead of N. (Proving this is a standard exercise in an advanced undergraduate or beginning graduate course in statistical theory.) The technical term here is that s2 (because of the division by N−1) is an *unbiased estimator* of σ2.

Another way to think about it is that with a sample you have N independent pieces of information. However, since ˉx is the average of those N pieces, if you know x1−ˉx,x2−ˉx,…,xN−1−ˉx, you can figure out what xN−ˉx is. So when you’re squaring and adding up the residuals xi−ˉx, there are really only N−1 independent pieces of information there. So in that sense perhaps dividing by N−1 rather than N makes sense. The technical term here is that there are N−1 *degrees of freedom* in the residuals xi−ˉx.

For more information, see Wikipedia’s article on the sample standard deviation.

**Attribution***Source : Link , Question Author : Rafid , Answer Author : Mike Spivey*