I am studying for an exam and I have been studying my butt off

during the winter break for it. During the course of my study I have written

down quite a number of tricks, which in my opinion were ‘outrageous’ :-). Meaning there

was no way I would come up with that during an exam if I hadn’t seen that before.Couple of examples.

- Sometimes, when you want to prove something about max, min, you write ( I got this from Baby Rudin)
max(a,b)=a+b+|a−b|2

min(a,b)=a+b−|a−b|2

To prove Hölder’s inequality (in its simplest case)

You write ∫(f+tg)2≥0 and since this stays positive

you get that the discriminant of this must be negative, and magically

you get your Hölder inequality.When you want to show something about distinct zeroes of complex functions you kind of eliminate the zeroes of f by dividing them with the appropriate Möbius transforms and you still get an analytic functions which has nice properties.

The value of these is that they can be used in other contexts to write neat proofs.

That’s what I mean by “tricks”. This might be difficult to answer,

but what are some of the tricks you wise folks have up your sleeve when it comes to

Advanced Calculus (Both single variable, multivariable) and complex Analysis.Anything you have to share will be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much for all your help.

**Answer**

Here are a couple of tricks and general plans of approach I know:

- If x∈R and for all ϵ>0 we have that |x|≤ϵ, then x=0. I think of this fact as being Real Analysis in a nutshell.
- Never forget that if A⊆R is bounded above and M=supA, then for all ϵ>0 there is a y∈A such that M<y+ϵ. Likewise if A is bounded below and m=infA, then for all ϵ>0 there is a y∈A such that y−ϵ<m. This is the most important tie between R's algebraic and ordering properties.
- Never underestimate the binomial theorem even if you just want an inequality. As an example, look at theorem 3.20(c) in Rudin and how he uses it.
- For all x,y∈R and any ϵ>0, we have the following inequality:

|xy|≤ϵx2+ϵ−1y22 This can be derived from the observiation that (ϵ|x|−|y|)2≥0. This inequality allows us to decide how much 'weight' we want to give to a particular term in a product. This can be used to show that the product of Riemann integrable functions is still Riemann integrable. - A simple inequality to remember is (a+b)p≤2p(ap+bp) for a,b,p≥0. This can be derived from the even simpler inequality (a+b)≤2max(a,b), again for positive values. This inequality can be used to show that the Lp spaces are vector spaces.
- The Weierstrass M-test is the first friend you call when dealing with series of functions.
- Ask yourself whether the problem you're working on can be generalized to topology first. Think about compactness and connectedness and the abstract theorems about them you already know.
- Perhaps the greatest topological property that R has is second-countability. This means that R is hereditarily-separable, sequential, Frechet-Urysohn, and c.c.c. This property of R allows us to consider sequences and sequential continuity in place of neighborhoods and continuity. As an adage, if you are working with ϵ, wonder to yourself if you can instead work with 1/n with n∈N.

**Attribution***Source : Link , Question Author : Community , Answer Author :
2 revsuser123641
*